Multilingual AI translation:

Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism

“…people who value social conformity… support the government when it wants to increase its control over social behavior and punish nonconformity…valuing social conformity increases the motivation for placing restrictions on behavior…the desire for social freedom is now subservient to the enforcement of social norms and rules. Thus, groups will be targeted for repression to the extent that they challenge social conformity…
~ Stanley Feldman, Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism


Fifty years after the publication of The Authoritarian Personality, the empirical literature on authoritarianism continues to grow even though there is no widely accepted theory to account for the phenomenon. The absence of a secure theoretical grounding severely limits our understanding of authoritarianism. This paper offers a new conceptualization in which authoritarian predispositions originate in the conflict between the values of social conformity and personal autonomy. Prejudice and intolerance should be observed among those who value social conformity and perceive a threat to social cohesion. These hypotheses were tested with a sample of undergraduate students; the questionnaire included new measures of the dimension of social conformity–autonomy as well as items from Altemeyer’s RWA (right–wing authoritarianism) scale.

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.”
~ Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal

Feldman, S.. (2003). Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism. Political Psychology

, 24(1), 41–74.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00316
directSciHub download

Passini, S.. (2022). Songs and flags: Concern for Covid-19 and submission to authority. Personality and Individual Differences

, 185, 111251.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111251
directSciHub download

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 + 8 =