N.B. Similar arguments apply to *smart*meters, WiFi, wireless headphones, etc. pp. (5G is a very different, much bigger animal).

Image source: Makker, K., Varghese, A., Desai, N. R., Mouradi, R., & Agarwal, A. (2009). Cell phones: Modern man’s nemesis? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3

The conscious electromagnetic information (cemi) field theory
McFadden, J. (2020). Integrating information in the brain’s EM field: the cemi field theory of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness. doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa016

“The conscious electromagnetic information (cemi) field theory claims that the brain’s EM field is the physical substrate of con-sciousness. It was first outlined in a book published in 2000 inwhich I proposed that the brain’s ‘EM field…integrate[s] infor-mation from all of the calculations…performed by…[its] logicgates (McFadden 2000). The theory was further developed intwo papers published in 2002 (McFadden2002a,b). Similar theo-ries were proposed around the same time by neurobiologistPockett (2000,2002), the neurophysiologistJohn (2001,2002) andthe neurophysiologistsFingelkurts and Fingelkurts (2008)andFingelkurtset al.(2001).”
Source URL: academic.oup.com/nc/article/2020/1/niaa016/5909853
Further references:
McFadden, J. (2020). Integrating information in the brain’s EM field: the cemi field theory of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness. doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa016
Mcfadden, J. (2002). Synchronous Firing and Its Electromagnetic Field. Journal of Conciousness Studies.
McFadden, J. (2007). Conscious electromagnetic field theory. NeuroQuantology. doi.org/10.14704/nq.2007.5.3.135
McFadden, J. (2013). The CEMI field theory: Closing the loop. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Mcfadden, J. (2013). The CEMI Field Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Mcfadden, J. (2002). Synchronous Firing and Its Influence on the Brain’s Electromagnetic Field Evidence for an Electromagnetic Field Theory of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
McFadden, J. (2002). Synchronous firing and its influence on the brains electromagnetic field. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
McFadden, J. (2013). The CEMI field theory: Gestalt information and the meaning of meaning. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
Mcfadden, J. (2013). EM fields and the meaning of meaning response to Jonathan C.W. Edwards. Journal of Consciousness Studies.

Do you know the fine print of your mobile phone?
Find your specific model in seconds and read the fine print so you know!
showthefineprint.org
Protect yourself (and your kids): showthefineprint.org/protect-yourself
Fine print may protect manufacturers legally. Let’s protect consumers in reality:
Put the cell phone safety warnings up front, where we can see them.

“The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation” lecture by Dr. Devra Davis
The University of Melbourne

See associated case @ U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Study excerpt

In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation.Epidemiological studies provided supportive evidence of increased risk for head and brain tumours, i.e., acoustic neuroma and glioma. The working group reached the conclusion that RF radiation from devices that emit non-ionizing RF radiation in the frequency range 30 kHz-300 GHz, is a Group 2B, i.e. a ‘possible’, human carcinogen (3,4). Later studies have corroborated these findings and have thus strengthened the evidence (5–8). … Several laboratory studies have indicated mechanisms of action for RF radiation carcinogenesis such as on DNA repair, oxidative stress, down regulation of mRNA and DNA damage with single strand breaks (9–13). A report was released from The National Toxicology Program (NTP) under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in USA on the largest ever animal study on cell phone RF radiation and cancer (14). An increased incidence of glioma in the brain and malignant schwannoma in the heart was found in rats. Acoustic neuroma or vestibular schwannoma is a similar type of tumour as the one found in the heart, although benign. Thus, this animal study supported human epidemiological findings on RF radiation and brain tumour risk (8).

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

Smart Meter Documentary - Take Back Your Power 2017
Naval Medical Research Institute Report on biological phenomena associated with microwave and radio-frequency radiation (published in 1971)
Cell Phone 'Poisoning' - A synopsis

www.5gappeal.eu
Hardell, L., & Nyberg, R. (2020). Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation. Molecular and clinical oncology, 12(3), 247–257. doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.1984

Nyberg, N. R., McCredden, J. E., Weller, S. G., & Hardell, L. (2022). The European Union prioritises economics over health in the rollout of radiofrequency technologies. Reviews on Environmental Health. doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0106

Abstract

“The fifth generation of radiofrequency communication, 5G, is currently being rolled out worldwide. Since September 2017, the EU 5G Appeal has been sent six times to the EU, requesting a moratorium on the rollout of 5G. This article reviews the 5G Appeal and the EU’s subsequent replies, including the extensive cover letter sent to the EU in September 2021, requesting stricter guidelines for exposures to radiofrequency radiation (RFR). The Appeal notes the EU’s internal conflict between its approach to a wireless technology-led future, and the need to protect the health and safety of its citizens. It critiques the reliance of the EU on the current guidelines given by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), that consider only heating and no other health relevant biological effects from RFR. To counteract the ICNIRP position, the 2021 cover letter briefly presented recent research from the EU’s own expert groups, from a large collection of European and other international studies, and from previous reviews of the effects of RFR on humans and the environment. The 5G Appeal asserts that the majority of scientific evidence points to biological effects, many with the potential for harm, occurring below the ICNIRP public limits. Evidence to establish this position is drawn from studies showing changes to neurotransmitters and receptors, damage to cells, proteins, DNA, sperm, the immune system, and human health, including cancer. The 2021 Appeal goes on to warn that 5G signals are likely to additionally alter the behaviour of oxygen and water molecules at the quantum level, unfold proteins, damage skin, and cause harm to insects, birds, frogs, plants and animals. Altogether, this evidence establishes a high priority for the European Union towards (i) replacing the current flawed guidelines with protective thresholds, and (ii) placing a moratorium on 5G deployment so as to (iii) allow industry-independent scientists the time needed to propose new health-protective guidelines. This 2021 Appeal’s relevance becomes even more pressing in the context of the EU plans to roll out the sixth generation of wireless technologies, 6G, further adding to the known risks of RFR technology for humans and the environment. This all leads to an important question: Do EU decision makers have the right to ignore EÚs own directives by prioritising economic gain over human and environmental health?”

Source URL: research.abo.fi/en/publications/the-european-union-prioritises-economics-over-health-in-the-rollo

See also EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA) PE 690.012 – July 2021

Further References

Makker, K., Varghese, A., Desai, N. R., Mouradi, R., & Agarwal, A.. (2009). Cell phones: Modern man’s nemesis?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Nittby, H., Grafström, G., Tian, D. P., Malmgren, L., Brun, A., Persson, B. R. R., … Eberhardt, J.. (2008). Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/bem.20386
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Megha, K., Deshmukh, P. S., Banerjee, B. D., Tripathi, A. K., & Abegaonkar, M. P.. (2012). Microwave radiation induced oxidative stress, cognitive impairment and inflammation in brain of Fischer rats. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1109/GSIS.2011.6044119
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Krause, C., Björnberg, C., Pesonen, M., Hulten, A., Liesivuori, T., Koivisto, M., … Hämäläinen, H.. (2006). Mobile phone effects on children’s event-related oscillatory EEG during an auditory memory task. International Journal of Radiation Biology

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1080/09553000600840922
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Mortazavi, S. A. R., Tavakkoli-Golpayegani, A., Haghani, M., & Mortazavi, S. M. J.. (2014). Looking at the other side of the coin: The search for possible biopositive cognitive effects of the exposure to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone radiofrequency radiation. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-75
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Guo, J., Wang, X. W., Sheng, J., & Tang, J. T.. (2009). Biological effects of electromagnetic radiation on the nervous system. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research

Plain numerical DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2009.30.031
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Tang, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Chen, Q., Tan, L., Zuo, S., … Zhu, G.. (2015). Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats. Brain Research

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.019
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Fragopoulou, A. F., Miltiadous, P., Stamatakis, A., Stylianopoulou, F., Koussoulakos, S. L., & Margaritis, L. H.. (2010). Whole body exposure with GSM 900MHz affects spatial memory in mice. Pathophysiology

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.11.002
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Schoeni, A., Roser, K., & Röösli, M.. (2015). Memory performance, wireless communication and exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A prospective cohort study in adolescents. Environment International

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.025
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Gursatej Gandhi, A.. (2005). Genetic damage in mobile phone users: some preliminary findings. Indian Journal of Human Genetics

Plain numerical DOI: 10.4103/0971-6866.16810
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Caraglia, M., Marra, M., Mancinelli, F., D’Ambrosio, G., Massa, R., Giordano, A., … Bismuto, E.. (2005). Electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequency induce apoptosis and inactivation of the multi-chaperone complex in human epidermoid cancer cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20327
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Shahin, S., Mishra, V., Singh, S. P., & Chaturvedi, C. M.. (2014). 2.45-GHz microwave irradiation adversely affects reproductive function in male mouse, Mus musculus by inducing oxidative and nitrosative stress. Free Radical Research

Plain numerical DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2014.888717
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Ertilav, K., Uslusoy, F., Ataizi, S., & Nazıroğlu, M.. (2018). Long term exposure to cell phone frequencies (900 and 1800 MHz) induces apoptosis, mitochondrial oxidative stress and TRPV1 channel activation in the hippocampus and dorsal root ganglion of rats. Metabolic Brain Disease

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1007/s11011-017-0180-4
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Diem, E., Schwarz, C., Adlkofer, F., Jahn, O., & Rüdiger, H.. (2005). Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.03.006
DOI URL
directSciHub download

De Iuliis, G. N., Newey, R. J., King, B. V., & Aitken, R. J.. (2009). Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS ONE

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006446
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Leszczynski, D., Joenväärä, S., Reivinen, J., & Kuokka, R.. (2002). Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: Molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. Differentiation

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.700207.x
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Leszczynski, D., Joenväärä, S., Reivinen, J., & Kuokka, R.. (2002). Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: Molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. Differentiation

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2002.700207.x
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Kesari, K. K., Meena, R., Nirala, J., Kumar, J., & Verma, H. N.. (2014). Effect of 3G Cell Phone Exposure with Computer Controlled 2-D Stepper Motor on Non-thermal Activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK Stress Pathway in Rat Brain. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9715-4
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Kesari, K. K., Siddiqui, M. H., Meena, R., Verma, H. N., & Kumar, S.. (2013). Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Lai, H., & Hardell, L.. (2011). Cell phone radiofrequency radiation exposure and brain glucose metabolism. JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.201
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Aly, A. A., Deris, S. Bin, & Zaki, N.. (2008). Research review on the biological effect of cell phone radiation on human. In 2008 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, IIT 2008

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2008.4781774
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Yakymenko, I., & Sidorik, E.. (2010). Risks of carcinogenesis from electromagnetic radiation of mobile telephony devices. Experimental Oncology

Plain numerical DOI: 45/835 [pii]
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Hossmann, K. A., & Hermann, D. M.. (2003). Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation of Mobile Phones on the Central Nervous System. Bioelectromagnetics

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/bem.10068
DOI URL
directSciHub download

Panagopoulos, D. J., Chavdoula, E. D., Nezis, I. P., & Margaritis, L. H.. (2007). Cell death induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutation Research – Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.008
DOI URL
directSciHub download