Wrye Sententia (2004, p. 227) defined cognitive liberty as concisely as
the right and freedom to control one’s own consciousness and electrochemical thought process.
SENTENTIA, W.. (2006). Neuroethical Considerations: Cognitive Liberty and Converging Technologies for Improving Human Cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
, 1013(1), 221–228.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1196/annals.1305.014
Show/hide publication abstract
“Developers of nbic (nano-bio-info-cogno) technologies face a multitude of obstacles, not the least of which is navigating the public ethics of their applied research. biotechnologies have received widespread media attention and spawned heated interest in their perceived social implications. now, in view of the rapidly expanding purview of neuroscience and the growing array of technologic developments capable of affecting or monitoring cognition, the emerging field of neuroethics calls for a consideration of the social and ethical implications of neuroscientific discoveries and trends. to negotiate the complex ethical issues at stake in new and emerging kinds of technologies for improving human cognition, we need to overcome political, disciplinary, and religious sectarianism. we need analytical models that protect values of personhood at the heart of a functional democracy – values that allow, as much as possible, for individual decision-making, despite transformations in our understanding and ability to manipulate cognitive processes. addressing cognitive enhancement from the legal and ethical notion of ‘cognitive liberty’ provides a powerful tool for assessing and encouraging nbic developments.”
Ethical issues in the use of cognitive enhancement.Darby R. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2010 Spring;73(2):16-22. PMID: 20455376 No abstract available.
Systems theory and the ethics of human enhancement: a framework for NBIC convergence.Khushf G. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 May;1013:124-49. doi: 10.1196/annals.1305.007. PMID: 15194611
Models for the neuroethical debate in the community.Timpane J. Cerebrum. 2004 Fall;6(4):100-7. PMID: 15986544
Ethical considerations of neuroscience research: the perspectives on neuroethics in Japan.Fukushi T, Sakura O, Koizumi H. Neurosci Res. 2007 Jan;57(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 10. PMID: 17034890 Review.
Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement.Sahakian BJ, Morein-Zamir S. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;25(2):197-204. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106926. Epub 2010 Mar 8. PMID: 20212064 Review.
Cited by 9 articles
On Neurorights.Ienca M. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:701258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258. eCollection 2021. PMID: 34630057 Free PMC article. Review.
Brain Recording, Mind-Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices to Brain-Based Speech Decoding.Rainey S, Martin S, Christen A, Mégevand P, Fourneret E. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2295-2311. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00218-0. Epub 2020 Apr 30. PMID: 32356091 Free PMC article.
Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity: The Moral Requirements for Any Neural Prosthesis.Lavazza A. Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 19;12:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00082. eCollection 2018. PMID: 29515355 Free PMC article.
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity: Ethical Considerations.Iwry J, Yaden DB, Newberg AB. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;11:281. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00281. eCollection 2017. PMID: 28638327 Free PMC article.
Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology.Ienca M, Andorno R. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2017 Dec;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1. Epub 2017 Apr 26. PMID: 28444626 Free PMC article.