The Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA) is a controversial law in the United Kingdom intended to restrict the production, sale and supply of psychoactive substances. The bill was passed given Royal Assent on 28 January 2016, and came into force on 26 May 2016 across the entire United Kingdom. Legal scholars and human rights activists have criticized the legal PSA on legal and moral grounds and researchers have argued that the classification specified in the PSA is not evidence based and therefore scientifically invalid.
Open PDF
See also: https://cognitivelibertyuk.wordpress.com
Further References
Nutt, D. J., King, L. A., & Phillips, L. D.. (2010). Drug harms in the UK: A multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61462-6
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
“Background: proper assessment of the harms caused by the misuse of drugs can inform policy makers in health, policing, and social care. we aimed to apply multicriteria decision analysis (mcda) modelling to a range of drug harms in the uk. method: members of the independent scientific committee on drugs, including two invited specialists, met in a 1-day interactive workshop to score 20 drugs on 16 criteria: nine related to the harms that a drug produces in the individual and seven to the harms to others. drugs were scored out of 100 points, and the criteria were weighted to indicate their relative importance. findings: mcda modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals (part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively), whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others (46, 21, and 17, respectively). overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug (overall harm score 72), with heroin (55) and crack cocaine (54) in second and third places. interpretation: these findings lend support to previous work assessing drug harms, and show how the improved scoring and weighting approach of mcda increases the differentiation between the most and least harmful drugs. however, the findings correlate poorly with present uk drug classification, which is not based simply on considerations of harm. funding: centre for crime and justice studies (uk). © 2010 elsevier ltd.”
van Amsterdam, J., Nutt, D., Phillips, L., & van den Brink, W.. (2015). European rating of drug harms. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(6), 655–660.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1177/0269881115581980
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
“BACKGROUND: the present paper describes the results of a rating study performed by a group of european union (eu) drug experts using the multi-criteria decision analysis model for evaluating drug harms. methods: forty drug experts from throughout the eu scored 20 drugs on 16 harm criteria. the expert group also assessed criteria weights that would apply, on average, across the eu. weighted averages of the scores provided a single, overall weighted harm score (range: 0-100) for each drug. results: alcohol, heroin and crack emerged as the most harmful drugs (overall weighted harm score 72, 55 and 50, respectively). the remaining drugs had an overall weighted harm score of 38 or less, making them much less harmful than alcohol. the overall weighted harm scores of the eu experts correlated well with those previously given by the uk panel. conclusion: the outcome of this study shows that the previous national rankings based on the relative harms of different drugs are endorsed throughout the eu. the results indicates that eu and national drug policy measures should focus on drugs with the highest overall harm, including alcohol and tobacco, whereas drugs such as cannabis and ecstasy should be given lower priority including a lower legal classification.”