Analysis of the personality of Adolph Hitler
Adolf Hitler was a German politician, demagogue, and Pan-German revolutionary, who was the leader of the Nazi Party, Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945 and Führer of Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945.
Author: Henry A. Murray, M. D.
Print Source:Nuremberg, Germany: International Military Tribunal, 1943-10-00
Publication Info: Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Law Library
hitler
José Delgado, implants, and electromagnetic mind control: Stopping the furious Bull
José Manuel Rodríguez Delgado (August 8, 1915 – September 15, 2011) was a Spanish professor of physiology at Yale University, famed for his research on mind control through electrical stimulation of the brain.
medicine.yale.edu/psychiatry/newsandevents/delgado.aspx
Delgrado used permanent brain implants to control behaviour. Later he utilised non-inversive methods.
- José Manuel Rodríguez Delgado (1969). Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society. Harper and Row. ISBN 978-0-06-090208-7.
- Delgado JM (1977–1978). “Instrumentation, working hypotheses, and clinical aspects of neurostimulation”. Applied Neurophysiology. 40 (2–4): 88–110.
- Delgado, Jose M.; et al. Intracerebral Radio Stimulation and recording in Completely Free Patients, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol 147(4), 1968, 329-340.
- Delgado, José M.R. (1964). Free Behavior and Brain Stimulation. International Review of Neurobiology. 6. pp. 349–449. doi:10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60773-4.
Rodríguez Delgado’s research interests centered on the use of electrical signals to evoke responses in the brain. His earliest work was with cats, but he later did experiments with monkeys and humans, including psychiatric patients.[3][4]
Much of Rodríguez Delgado’s work was with an invention he called a stimoceiver, a radio which joined a stimulator of brain waves with a receiver which monitored E.E.G. waves and sent them back on separate radio channels. Some of these stimoceivers were as small as half-dollars. This allowed the subject of the experiment full freedom of movement while allowing the experimenter to control the experiment. This was a great improvement from his early equipment which included visual disturbance in those whose wires ran from the brain to bulky equipment that both recorded data and delivered the desired electrical charges to the brain. This early equipment, while not allowing for a free range of movement, was also the cause of infection in many subjects.[5]
The stimoceiver could be used to stimulate emotions and control behavior. According to Rodríguez Delgado, “Radio Stimulation of different points in the amygdala and hippocampus in the four patients produced a variety of effects, including pleasant sensations, elation, deep, thoughtful concentration, odd feelings, super relaxation, colored visions, and other responses.” Rodríguez Delgado stated that “brain transmitters can remain in a person’s head for life. The energy to activate the brain transmitter is transmitted by way of radio frequencies.”[6]
Using the stimoceiver, Rodríguez Delgado found that he could not only elicit emotions, but he could also elicit specific physical reactions. These specific physical reactions, such as the movement of a limb or the clenching of a fist, were achieved when Rodríguez Delgado stimulated the motor cortex. A human whose implants were stimulated to produce a reaction were unable to resist the reaction and so one patient said “I guess, doctor, that your electricity is stronger than my will”. Some consider one of Rodríguez Delgado‘s most promising finds is that of an area called the septum within the limbic region. This area, when stimulated by Rodríguez Delgado, produced feelings of strong euphoria. These euphoric feelings were sometimes strong enough to overcome physical pain and depression.[2]
Rodríguez Delgado created many inventions and was called a “technological wizard” by one of his Yale colleagues. Other than the stimoceiver, Rodríguez Delgado also created a “chemitrode” which was an implantable device that released controlled amounts of a drug into specific brain areas. Rodríguez Delgado also invented an early version of what is now a cardiac pacemaker.[2]
In Rhode Island, Rodríguez Delgado did some work at what is now a closed mental hospital. He chose patients who were “desperately ill patients whose disorders had resisted all previous treatments” and implanted electrodes in about 25 of them. Most of these patients were either schizophrenics or epileptics. To determine the best placement of electrodes within the human patients, Delgado initially looked to the work of Wilder Penfield, who studied epileptics’ brains in the 1930s, as well as earlier animal experiments, and studies of brain-damaged people.[2]
The most famous example of the stimoceiver in action occurred at a Córdoba bull breeding ranch. Rodríguez Delgado stepped into the ring with a bull which had had a stimoceiver implanted within its brain. The bull charged Delgado, who pressed a remote control button which caused the bull to stop its charge. Always one for theatrics, he taped this stunt and it can be seen today.[7] The region of the brain Rodríguez Delgado stimulated when he pressed the hand-held transmitter was the caudate nucleus. This region was chosen to be stimulated because the caudate nucleus is involved in controlling voluntary movements.[2] Rodríguez Delgado claimed that the stimulus caused the bull to lose its aggressive instinct.
Although the bull incident was widely mentioned in the popular media, Rodríguez Delgado believed that his experiment with a female chimpanzee named Paddy was more significant. Paddy was fitted with a stimoceiver linked to a computer that detected the brain signal called a spindle which was emitted by her part of the brain called the amygdala. When the spindle was recognized, the stimoceiver sent a signal to the central gray area of Paddy’s brain, producing an ‘aversive reaction’. In this case, the aversive reaction was an unpleasant or painful feeling. The result of the aversive reaction to the stimulus was a negative feedback to the brain.[2] Within hours her brain was producing fewer spindles as a result of the negative feedback.[8] As a result, Paddy became “quieter, less attentive and less motivated during behavioral testing”. Although Paddy’s reaction was not exactly ideal, Rodríguez Delgado hypothesized that the method used on Paddy could be used on others to stop panic attacks, seizures, and other disorders controlled by certain signals within the brain.[2] [9][10] Publication
José Rodríguez Delgado authored 134 scientific publications within two decades (1950-1970) on electrical stimulation on cats, monkeys and patients – psychotic and non-psychotic. In 1963, New York Times featured his experiments on their front page. Rodríguez Delgado had implanted a stimoceiver in the caudate nucleus of a fighting bull. He could stop the animal mid-way that would come running towards a waving red flag.[11]
He was invited to write his book Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilised Society as the forty-first volume in a series entitled World Perspectives edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen. In it Rodríguez Delgado has discussed how we have managed to tame and civilize our surrounding nature, arguing that now it was time to civilize our inner being. The book has been a centre of controversy since its release.[1] The tone of the book was challenging and the philosophical speculations went beyond the data. Its intent was to encourage less cruelty, and a more benevolent, happier, better man, however it clashed religious sentiments.
José Rodríguez Delgado continued to publish his research and philosophical ideas through articles and books for the next quarter century. He in all wrote over 500 articles and six books. His final book in 1989, was named Happiness and had 14 editions.
Delgado later learned he could duplicate the results he got with the stimoceiver without any implants at all, using only specific types of electromagnetic radiation interacting with the brain. He lamented he didn’t have access to the technology when Franco was in power, as it would have allowed him to control the dictator at a distance.
Articles
- John Horgan (October 2005). “The Forgotten Era of Brain Chips” (PDF). Scientific American. 293 (4): 66–73. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1005-66.
- John Horgan (October 2004). “The Myth of Mind Control: Will anyone ever decode the human brain?”. Discover. 25 (10). Archived from the original (Scholar search) on October 20, 2006.
- Maggie Scarf (1971-11-25). “Brain Researcher Jose Delgado Asks “What Kind of Humans Would We Like to Construct?““. New York Times.
- Delgado JM (1977–1978). “Instrumentation, working hypotheses, and clinical aspects of neurostimulation”. Applied Neurophysiology. 40 (2–4): 88–110. doi:10.1159/000102436. PMID 101139.
Books
- Elliot S. Valenstein (1973). Brain Control: A Critical Examination of Brain Stimulation and Psychosurgery. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-89784-2.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1970.tb01129.x
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1038/npp.2012.160
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00281-1
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1971.25.3.485
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.006
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60773-4
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1159/000105792
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.10.006
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1038/srep19753
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Conférence avec Edward Snowden (Taking individual risk for the greater good)
Que faire face à la société de surveillance ? / Facing a surveillance society
Échanges avec et autour d’Edward Snowden en direct de Russie
6 décembre 2018 Université Paris
Panthéon-Sorbonne Conférence
Further References
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1177/2053951714541861
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1111/ips.12048
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2013.90
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1145/2663341
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1199726
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain num>erical DOI: 10.1177/1940161214566709
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
</p
Show/hide publication abstract
</br<>
Plain numerical DOI: 10.5860/choice.38-0594
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S1361-3723(15)30111-1
DOI URL
directSciHub download
[accotextannotation”>rdion c>pan>licktoclose=”true”]
Show/hide publication abstract
[/accordion]
[accordion clicktoclose=”true”]
Show/hide publication abstract
[/accordion]Plain numerical DOI: 10.1080/08821127.2017.1344075
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1177/0191453714537263
DOI URL
directSciHub download<br>
Show/hide publication abstract
Prof. Rainer Mausfeld – Neoliberal indoctrination: Why do the lambs remain silent?
www.uni-kiel.de/psychologie/mausfeld/
Mausfeld_Why do the lambs remain silent_2015
Mausfeld focuses on perceptual psychology and also works on the theoretical foundations of experimental psychology and the psychology of understanding. He also deals with the rivalry of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience in cognitive science. Another area of interest is the history of ideas in the natural sciences. He sees a major problem of the relationship between psychology and biology in neurological neo-reductionism. In contrast to biologistic approaches, he sees the peculiarity of the spiritual, inter alia, in the intrinsic multiperspectivity of the mind.
Mausfeld points out that knowledge of neural circuitry and activity is not enough to explain consciousness and thought processes. Not even the behavior of nematodes can be deduced from the activity of their 302 neurons. According to Mausfeld’s view, the relationship between nature and mind must be below the neural level in the sphere of physics. Evidence is given by the fact that nature is actually more enigmatic to us than our consciousness in itself. In modern physics it has become clear that the physical does not have the properties of matter ascribed to it. Mausfeld sees the special aspect of consciousness in the simplicity and wholeness of the subjective experience, which, however, reveals itself to the psychologist as a complex interaction of unconscious factors. The intrinsic multiperspectivity of thinking, which first opens up the possibilities for thought and action alternatives to humans after mouse field, results from the complex interplay of the most varied of factors.
White torture and responsibility of science
In his work, Mausfeld illustrates the role of psychologists in the development, application and justification of modern white torture methods. These goals are not, as claimed, the extraction of information, but rather breaking the will, disciplining, humiliating and shaming the victims. In his account, an American Psychological Association (APA) working group to investigate the involvement of psychologists acting on behalf of the Defense Secretary. Mausfeld uses the example of torture research to define ethical and legal principles and limits of scientific work. He regards the observance of human rights as fully binding.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0886-5
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042.60.4.229
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Cognitive techniques
According to Mausfeld, the cognitive ones are more important than the affective techniques, since opinions are more stable than emotions. Here Mausfeld examines the following methods:
- Representation of facts as opinion
- Fragmenting coherent facts so that the context, such as the historical context, is lost
- Decontextualization of facts: The context of the facts is removed, so that the facts become incomprehensible isolated individual cases, which have no general relevance
- Misleading recontextualization: Information is embedded in a foreign context, so that they take on a different character and, for example, no longer lead to outrage in human rights violations.
- Repetition supports the “perceived truth”
- Designing the range of opinions so that the desired seems to be in the middle, which most people strive for, if they are unfamiliar, because they then keep to the middle seein it as “neutral and balanced”
- Making facts invisible through media selection, distraction and attention control
- “Meta-propaganda”: It is part of every propaganda to claim that the news of the enemy is wrong because it is propaganda
The development of more efficient manipulation techniques rests on identifying psychological “weak spots” – those intrinsic design aspects of our mind and principles of human information processing that can be exploited for manipulation purposes. Most importantly, such principles are, by the very nature of our cognitive architecture, beyond conscious control. (…) Our mind has many hard-wired weaknesses that can be exploited for manipulative purposes, that facilitate our utilitarian abuse by the political and economic elites for maintaining and expanding their power. However, we also innately dispose of a rich repertoire of ways to use our reasoning capabilities to recognize manipulative contexts and to actively avoid them. This repertoire is akin to a natural cognitive immune system against being manipulated, but we have to take the deliberate decision to actually use it.
neoliberal indoctrination - Copy
Further References
Plain numerical DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00067
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198505006.001.0001
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/0470013427.ch4
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042.60.4.229
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1167/8.1.14
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000045
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.467
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198505006.003.0013
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/9781118329016.ch3
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01530083
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1068/p07sp
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07177.x
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.4324/9780203845820
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10769-6_12
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.005
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1068/i0603
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Killing babies in incubators – The fake Nayirah testimony (PR PsyOp)
The Nayirah testimony (aka the incubator lie) is a paradigmatic case as it demonstrates how the psychology of emotions is abused in the mass-media. Psychology in action!
The whole things was a staged PsyOp by the PR firm “Hill and Knowlton”.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1353/aq.2017.0004
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Show/hide publication abstract
The British Raj in India
Dr. Tharoor delivers a lecture, entitled ‘Looking Back at the British Raj in India’, and discuses how the British empire ruthlessly has exploited and devastated India. He cogently argues that the British have to pay reparations to India.
Further References
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1525/ae.1998.25.1.82.1
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1080/13488678.1999.10801024
DOI URL
directSciHub download