Further References

Akbari, H., Khalighinejad, B., Herrero, J., Mehta, A., & Mesgarani, N. (2018). Towards reconstructing intelligible speech from the human auditory cortex. BioRxiv. doi.org/10.1101/350124.

Article Google Scholar
Akst, J. (2013). Decoding dreams. The Scientist Magazine. www.the-scientist.com/notebook/decoding-dreams-39990. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.
Allison, B. Z., Wolpaw, E. W., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2007). Brain–computer interface systems: Progress and prospects. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 4(4), 463–474.

Article Google Scholar
Amodei, D., Ananthanarayanan, S., Anubhai, R., Bai, J., Battenberg, E., Case, C., Casper, J., Catanzaro, B., Cheng, Q., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Chrzanowski, M., Coates, A., Diamos, G., Ding, K., Du, N., Elsen, E., et al. (2016). Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech recognition in English and Mandarin. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 173–182). proceedings.mlr.press/v48/amodei16.html. Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R. K., & Birch, G. E. (2007). A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain–computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals. Journal of Neural Engineering, 4(2), R32. doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/R03.

Article Google Scholar
Bocquelet, F., Hueber, T., Girin, L., Savariaux, C., & Yvert, B. (2016). Real-time control of an articulatory-based speech synthesizer for brain computer interfaces. PLoS Computational Biology, 12(11), e1005119. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005119.

Article Google Scholar
Boire, R. G. (2001). On cognitive liberty. The Journal of Cognitive Liberties, 2(1), 7–22.

Google Scholar
Bollier, D., & Firestone, C. M. (2010). The promise and peril of big data (pp. 1–66). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute, Communications and Society Program.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

Article Google Scholar
Brumberg, J. S., et al. (2011). Classification of intended phoneme production from chronic intracortical microelectrode recordings in speech-motor cortex. Frontiers in Neuroscience. doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00065.

Article Google Scholar
Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018). The Cambridge analytica files. The Guardian, 6–7. davelevy.info/Downloads/cabridgeananalyticafiles%20-theguardian_20180318.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2019.
Chakrabarti, S., Sandberg, H. M., Brumberg, J. S., & Krusienski, D. J. (2015). Progress in speech decoding from the electrocorticogram. Biomedical Engineering Letters, 5(1), 10–21. doi.org/10.1007/s13534-015-0175-1.

Article Google Scholar
Chang, L., & Tsao, D. Y. (2017). The code for facial identity in the primate brain. Cell, 169(6), 1013–1028.e14. doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.011.

Article Google Scholar
Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (2016). Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1989). Neurophilosophy toward a unified science of the mind brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Google Scholar
Collins, D., Efford, C., Elliot, J., Farrelly, P., Hart, S., Knight, J., et al. (2019). Disinformation and ‘fake news’ (Vol. 8, p. 111). London: The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.

Google Scholar
Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate. Social Networks, 50, 6–16. doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.002.

Article Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1993). Consciousness explained (New Ed ed.). London: Penguin.

Google Scholar
Eickhoff, S. B., & Langner, R. (2019). Neuroimaging-based prediction of mental traits: Road to utopia or Orwell? PLoS Biology, 17(11), e3000497. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000497.

Article Google Scholar
Farah, M. J., Smith, M. E., Gawuga, C., Lindsell, D., & Foster, D. (2009). Brain imaging and brain privacy: A Realistic Concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 119–127. doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21010.

Article Google Scholar
Farahany, N. (2018). When technology can read minds, how will we protect our privacy? www.ted.com/talks/nita_farahany_when_technology_can_read_minds_how_will_we_protect_our_privacy. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
Forrest, C. (2017). Facebook planning brain–to–text interface so you can type with your thoughts. TechRepublic. www.techrepublic.com/article/facebook-planning-brain-to-text-interface-so-you-can-type-with-your-thoughts/.
Glannon, W. (2016). Ethical issues in neuroprosthetics. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(2), 021002. doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/021002.

Article Google Scholar
Gnanayutham, P., & Good, A. (2011). Disabled users accessing off-the-shelf software using a button interface. In Paper presented at computer science and information systems, 7th annual international conference. Athens.
Haynes, J.-D., Sakai, K., Rees, G., Gilbert, S., Frith, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology, 17(4), 323–328.

Article Google Scholar
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A., Jaitly, N., et al. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82–97. doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597.

Article Google Scholar
Howard, P. N., & Kollanyi, B. (2016). Bots, #Strongerin, and #Brexit: Computational propaganda during the UK–EU referendum (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2798311). Social Science Research Network. papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2798311. Accessed 21 Mar 2019.
Ienca, M., Haselager, P., & Emanuel, E. J. (2018). Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nature Biotechnology, 36, 805–810. doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4240.

Article Google Scholar
Ikeda, S., Shibata, T., Nakano, N., Okada, R., Tsuyuguchi, N., Ikeda, K., et al. (2014). Neural decoding of single vowels during covert articulation using electrocorticography. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00125.

Article Google Scholar
Kapur, A., Kapur, S., & Maes, P. (2018). AlterEgo: A personalized wearable silent speech interface. In 23rd International conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 43–53).
Kay, K. N., Naselaris, T., Prenger, R. J., & Gallant, J. L. (2008). Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature, 452(7185), 352–355. doi.org/10.1038/nature06713.

Article Google Scholar
Kellmeyer, P. (2018). Big brain data: On the responsible use of brain data from clinical and consumer-directed neurotechnological devices. Neuroethics. doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9371-x.

Article Google Scholar
Martin, S., Brunner, P., Holdgraf, C., Heinze, H.-J., Crone, N. E., Rieger, J., et al. (2014). Decoding spectrotemporal features of overt and covert speech from the human cortex. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 7, 14. doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00014/full.

Article Google Scholar
Martin, S., Brunner, P., Iturrate, I., Millán, J. R., Schalk, G., Knight, R. T., et al. (2016). Word pair classification during imagined speech using direct brain recordings. Scientific Reports, 6, srep25803. doi.org/10.1038/srep25803.

Article Google Scholar
McStay, A., & Urquhart, L. (2019). ‘This time with feeling?’ Assessing EU data governance implications of out of home appraisal based emotional AI. First Monday. doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i10.9457.

Article Google Scholar
Mecacci, G., & Haselager, P. (2019). Identifying criteria for the evaluation of the implications of brain reading for mental privacy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 443–461. doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0003-3.

Article Google Scholar
Meegan, D. V. (2008). Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(1), 9–20. doi.org/10.1080/15265160701842007.

Article Google Scholar
Mégevand, P. (2014). Telepathy or a painstaking conversation in morse code? Pierre Mégevand goes beyond the media hype. PLOS Neuroscience Community. blogs.plos.org/neuro/2014/09/08/telepathy-or-a-painstaking-conversation-in-morse-code-pierre-megevand-goes-beyond-the-media-hype/. Accessed 16 Aug 2018.
Pei, X., Barbour, D., Leuthardt, E. C., & Schalk, G. (2011). Decoding vowels and consonants in spoken and imagined words using electrocorticographic signals in humans. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8(4), 046028. doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046028.

Article Google Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J.-P., Baciu, M., & Lœvenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 220–239. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034.

Article Google Scholar
Rainey, S. (2018). A steadying hand”: Ascribing speech acts to users of predictive speech assistive technologies. Journal of Law and Medicine, 26(1), 44–53.

Google Scholar
Rainey, S., Bublitz, J. C., Maslen, H., & Thornton, H. (2019). Data as a cross-cutting dimension of ethical importance in direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies. AJOB Neuroscience, 10(4), 180–182. doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1665134.

Article Google Scholar
Revell, T. (2018). Mind-reading devices can now access your thoughts and dreams using AI. New Scientist. www.newscientist.com/article/mg23931972-500-mind-reading-devices-can-now-access-your-thoughts-and-dreams-using-ai/. Accessed 16 Oct 2018.
Robertson, A. (2019). Facebook just published an update on its futuristic brain–typing project. The Verge. www.theverge.com/2019/7/30/20747483/facebook-ucsf-brain-computer-interface-typing-speech-recognition-experiment. Accessed 13 Aug 2019.
Roelfsema, P. R., Denys, D., & Klink, P. C. (2018). Mind reading and writing: The future of neurotechnology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 598–610.

Article Google Scholar
Sani, O. G., Yang, Y., Lee, M. B., Dawes, H. E., Chang, E. F., & Shanechi, M. M. (2018). Mood variations decoded from multi-site intracranial human brain activity. Nature Biotechnology, 36(10), 954–961. doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4200.

Article Google Scholar
Sententia, W. (2006). Neuroethical considerations: Cognitive liberty and converging technologies for improving human cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1013(1), 221–228. doi.org/10.1196/annals.1305.014.

Article Google Scholar
Solon, O. (2017). Facebook has 60 people working on how to read your mind. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/19/facebook-mind-reading-technology-f8. Accessed 14 Nov 2018.
Steinert, S., Bublitz, C., Jox, R., & Friedrich, O. (2018). Doing things with thoughts: Brain–computer interfaces and disembodied agency. Philosophy & Technology. doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0308-4.

Article Google Scholar
Steinert, S., & Friedrich, O. (2019). Wired emotions: Ethical issues of affective brain–computer interfaces. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00087-2.

Article Google Scholar
Sulleyman, A. (2018). Mind-reading headset allowing people to control computers with their thoughts described in Microsoft patent. The Independent. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/mind-reading-headset-computer-control-thoughts-microsoft-patent-a8163976.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2018.
Véliz, C. (2019). Privacy is a collective concern. www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/privacy/2019/10/privacy-collective-concern. Accessed 23 Oct 2019.
Wexler, A., & Thibault, R. (2018). Mind-reading or misleading? Assessing direct-to-consumer electroencephalography (EEG) devices marketed for wellness and their ethical and regulatory implications. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0091-2.

Article Google Scholar
Whyte, C. (2018). Mind-reading headset lets you Google just with your thoughts. New Scientist. www.newscientist.com/article/mg23731723-300-mind-reading-headset-lets-you-google-just-with-your-thoughts/. Accessed 14 Nov 2018.